Skip to main content

The Good:Don Siegel's COOGAN'S BLUFF

 COOGAN'S BLUFF

Clint Eastwood, Don Stroud, Susan Clark. Dir. Don Siegel, Universal, 1968

Do you know why self-styled cinephiles like me sigh, "the great Don Siegel," the way others moan, "Orson Welles, O god..."?

I admit it's probably annoying, but easily explained. Siegel directed the original INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS. He did the montages for CASABLANCA. He helmed DIRTY HARRY. A director usually saddled with b-picture budgets & second-tier actors had a way of turning in genre pictures, like INVASION, which looked & felt like a Howard Hawks or John Ford picture. Simply, Siegel spent a career transcending crap, often for little reward.

As 1968's COOGAN'S BLUFF more than illustrates. Another bare-bones budgeter riffing on the fish out of water trope, with a "modern western" twist for novelty, little in COOGAN'S BLUFF could've looked all that original. Except perhaps Clint.

The first of Eastwood & Siegel's collaborations, culminating in ESCAPE FROM ALCATRAZ, both men find a foil for one another not unlike Wayne & Hawks. Eastwood appears to have his usual low-key fun tangling with Lee J. Cobb's NYPD veteran, Don Stroud's Dennis-Hopper-wasn't-available hipster psycopath, & in trying to undress criminal advocate Susan Clark - yes, WEBSTER's Mom - even though she's mostly too smart for him.

One subgenre of film forever perplexing to me is the "modern western." Despite HUD & GIANT, it has always struck me as peculiar. Then I saw COOGAN'S BLUFF, a pure-d, horse-chase, gunfight western which happened to be set in 1968. COOGAN"s served as the template for NBC's Sunday Mystery, Dennis Weaver's McCloud. I have faint memories of McCloud, but it's hard, now, to imagine Clint not besting Weaver, a gifted actor's, work.

Susan Clark, as mentioned, got married to ex-NFL great Alex Karras & became family-TV icons via ABC's WEBSTER. Tricia Sterling, so startling as Stroud's deranged hippiechick lover, went on to nothing special. A thing must be said about Clint's movies: if he's involved or not, he attracts extraordinary actresses, who never fly as high again. Clark & Sterling serve as but the two for this picture.

If viewers can get by that, & enjoy Siegel & Eastwood's subversion of Western tropes, however, they're in for a satisying two hours at the movies.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Junkie-fatigue: Taylor Hackford's Ray

 Jamie Foxx, Kerry Washington, Terence Howard, Warwick Davis, Curtis Armstrong. Dir. Taylor Hackford, Bristol Bay/Universal, 2004 Jamie Foxx, nominated for both Supporting Actor and Best Actor at the 2004 Academy Awards, won Best Actor for Ray and, watching Ray tonight for the first time in about 15 years, I'm glad it went down that way. Tom Cruise gave a career-best performance in Collateral, for which Foxx received his Supporting Actor nod. It's a great performance, too, but no moreso than Cruise, ignored by the Academy, so it feels right to me that Foxx got his statuette for the movie where he didn't share the spotlight with a star of Cruise's magnitude. Not that it would make much difference if Foxx had some high-voltage costar in Ray, because the movie simply doesn't exist without Foxx and his essay of Ray Charles. Not unlike Coal Miner's Daughter, the other music biopic whose star picked up a Best Actor, Ray occurs from Ray's point of view, so ther...
Post a Comment
Read more

Cuck Fiction: Charles Vidor's GILDA

 Rita Hayworth, Glenn Ford, George MacReady, Steven Geray. Dir. Charles Vidor, Columbia, 1946 My favorite erotic fiction deals with cuckolding. The stories fascinate me. As people, cuckolds don't seem to think they're worth nice things. Or happiness. On the other hand, the cuckolding partners and their multiple lovers don't come over as the clear victors, either. Part of the fascination - maybe most of it - lies in trying to decide which party comes out the MOST degraded.  Is it the submissive, sensitive husband and his unsatisfactory size/staying power? Is it the "slutwife" who finds satiety in being transformed into a fuckdoll to humilate her husband? Or is it the lover - often black - who gets to degrade the sexy white lady but who doesn't otherwise matter? As in bdsm scenes, if the cuck is most degraded, that means he also "wins," as his desires to see his wife turned into a promiscuous slut while he gets to be bi without shame are most fulfi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Obligatory TL;DR Statement of Purpose

 A not-so-brief explanatory note as to how this blog works: I can't recall a time when movies weren't my passion, my compulsion, my addiction. Ever since my parents took me to see Disney's Bedknobs&Broomsticks, I've been hopeless. Born in 1967, I grew up with free range parents. They took my brother and me to all kinds of movies, often using Hollywood as a babysitter. We saw movies about which many parents today would cluck their tongues (though nothing R-rated until I was 12. My first R-rated movie was MONTY PYTHON'S LIFE OF BRIAN.) Though my parents were professionals and we grew up affluent, our home saw its share of dysfunction. Dad was in the house, but not often present. Mom, stressed and disappointed at discovering her marriage wasn't an equal partnership, took out her frustrations on me.  Without getting too far into the weeds, let me just say my adult life has been far from typical middle class stability. I've never had a career. Never finished ...
3 comments
Read more