Skip to main content

Obligatory TL;DR Statement of Purpose

 A not-so-brief explanatory note as to how this blog works:

I can't recall a time when movies weren't my passion, my compulsion, my addiction. Ever since my parents took me to see Disney's Bedknobs&Broomsticks, I've been hopeless. Born in 1967, I grew up with free range parents. They took my brother and me to all kinds of movies, often using Hollywood as a babysitter. We saw movies about which many parents today would cluck their tongues (though nothing R-rated until I was 12. My first R-rated movie was MONTY PYTHON'S LIFE OF BRIAN.)

Though my parents were professionals and we grew up affluent, our home saw its share of dysfunction. Dad was in the house, but not often present. Mom, stressed and disappointed at discovering her marriage wasn't an equal partnership, took out her frustrations on me. 

Without getting too far into the weeds, let me just say my adult life has been far from typical middle class stability. I've never had a career. Never finished a 4-year degree (I graduated from a private broadcasting school in 2004.) Never got married, never had kids, never managed to hold onto one place to live until 2015. I've lost music, book, and movie collections repeatedly due to evictions. I never built the kind of movie library to which I aspired. 

Until 2017, when a friend of mine gave me a small flatscreen and a dvd player. As physical media vanishes and streaming ascends, cheap &/or used dvds have proliferated. Thrift shops, antiques malls, dollar-stores, yard sales - they're to be found everywhere. That's all to the good because I live on a fixed income, below the federal poverty guideline, limiting my budget. With an average price of between $1-$5, though, I'm able to bring home as many as 20 used dvds/Blu-Rays each month. 

Hence, Cinema Serendipitous. If you find yourself here, wondering why a writeup of Treasure Planet precedes one of Frozen River, why there appear to be few films from recent years, why you can't find my thoughts on MOONLIGHT or GREENBOOK or PARASITE, it's because I haven't found them in the wild. Yet. I go out a few times a month, scouring my little town for movies. Sometimes, generous friends send me things they find, too. I'm building the movie library I always wanted through luck of the draw and random chance. 

I don't write traditional reviews (except when I do.) CINEMA SERENDIPITOUS functions as memoir as much as movie writing. I try to make sense of/account for my life using movies as a lens.

Readers don't need me to tell them what to think or whether or not to see a film. A movie is a story. It's a point of view. Some points of view make me cringe, some get me to stand up and salute. I let the film tell me its story, show me its point of view, then decide whether it's one I want to experience again. I want readers to see movies. I want them to have their own experience. It's not up to me to tell people to do the opposite. I try to find the compelling reasons to investigate a movie. 

Much of what I love and look for are movies I could not or did not see when I was younger. I'm a man and, too often, still a boy. I watch movies about men. I watch movies about women and kids and anthropomorphized animals, too, but movies that consider how masculinity works - or doesn't - find a home in my heart.

All the above may not be what you're looking for. I completely respect that. I've always been an acquired taste. Some acquired it long ago. Some never have and never will. 

I unapologetically love middle class, middlebrow, mainstream multiplex Oscar-bait dramas. Unlike some cinephiles, I do not fear complexity. I like movies to be about more than one thing. My favorite scifi, fantasy, and horror novels grapple with ideas as much as plot. I want the same in films. Tolkien loathed allegory - I think a little allegory never hurt anyone. Metaphor is my friend. 

You will find plenty of genre here, but movies such as CHINA SYNDROME and BRUBAKER helped radicalize me as a tween. I haven't found those in the wild, but I am as likely to rhapsodize over Michael Apted's AMAZING GRACE as NIGHT OF THE LIVING DEAD. 

TL;DR - my favorite acronym. Here endeth the disclaimer of the original disclaimer. 

Comments

  1. Definitely enjoy the randomness of your reviewed movies. That's definitely a lot of the fun. Sometime you find movies I've never heard of and other times you remind me of movies I haven't thought of in years (sometimes requiring I revisit it and sometimes reminding me why I haven't thought about it in years). Always a pleasure to read.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You know this, but I enjoy reading about how the movie connects to your life or your memories far more than I enjoy straight reviews.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No Return:Stanley Kramer's IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD

 IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD. Spencer Tracy, Ethel Merman, Milton Berle, Mickey Rooney, Sid Caesar. Dir. Stanley Kramer, MGM, 1963 I do not generally write about films I stop watching halfway. What's the point? I either have nothing positive to say about it or was in the wrong mood. In both cases I'm ignorant of its full length to perhaps do it justice. In the case of Stanley Kramer's 1963 comedy smash, however, I feel compelled to make an exception.  My problem with the movie is not my mood, nor disappointment because it's not the movie I once heard. In fact, my biggest problem is that I haven't heard it described in glowing terms, or any, since I was about 9. See, IAMMMMW used to air anually on one or another of the networks, often in December. My parents didn't care for it and never watched it, but my friends watched anytime it aired and talked about it in rapturous terms. Until about 9-10 years old, when it seemed to drop out of conversation, or conv...

Junkie-fatigue: Taylor Hackford's Ray

 Jamie Foxx, Kerry Washington, Terence Howard, Warwick Davis, Curtis Armstrong. Dir. Taylor Hackford, Bristol Bay/Universal, 2004 Jamie Foxx, nominated for both Supporting Actor and Best Actor at the 2004 Academy Awards, won Best Actor for Ray and, watching Ray tonight for the first time in about 15 years, I'm glad it went down that way. Tom Cruise gave a career-best performance in Collateral, for which Foxx received his Supporting Actor nod. It's a great performance, too, but no moreso than Cruise, ignored by the Academy, so it feels right to me that Foxx got his statuette for the movie where he didn't share the spotlight with a star of Cruise's magnitude. Not that it would make much difference if Foxx had some high-voltage costar in Ray, because the movie simply doesn't exist without Foxx and his essay of Ray Charles. Not unlike Coal Miner's Daughter, the other music biopic whose star picked up a Best Actor, Ray occurs from Ray's point of view, so ther...