Skip to main content

Two Way Vision:Clint Eastwood's EVERY WHICH WAY BUT LOOSE

 EVERY WHICH WAY BUT LOOSE

Clint Eastwood, Sandra Locke, Geoffery Lewis, Ruth Gordon. Dir. James Fargo, Warners, 1978

Clint Eastwood's slapstick-happy broad comedy smash from '78 can be understood one of two ways. In one, Clint's Philoe Beddoe, a working class bare knuckle brawler, serves as an almost Quixotic hero, or even a grail-quest knight, attracting followers & foes as he pursues his great loves, C&W hopeful Lynn Halsey Taylor, & defeating Tank Murdoch, the only brawler better than Philoe. If our grail knight ends up bereft of romantic love & his victory in combat, he knows in the end sometimes we take a beating to win our place in the world.

The other way makes people who see comedic genius in Vicky Lawrence shriek & whoop with laughter, most of it centered on Ruth Gordon, an inept motorcycle gang, & an orangutan called Clyde. This way is a low, vulgar comedy leavened mainly by Eastwood's stock company, including the late William O'Connell, Lewis, & Gregory Walcott from EIGER SANCTION. (Honorable Mention to Clint's use of longtime John Ford stock company member Hank Worden.) Apart from these, this way of seeing the film is as a crude, silly redneck burlesque cashing in on hits like SMOKEY & THE BANDIT.

THAT way isn't bad, or stupid, or wrong, but it isn't elegant and it isn't nearly as much fun. I see the picture the first way, but however it's understood, EVERY WHICH WAY BUT LOOSE deserves to be seen. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Collected&Directed #2:John Carpenter's DARK STAR & ASSAULT ON PRECINCT 13

  DARK STAR Dan O'Bannon, Brian Norelle, Cal Kuniholm, Dre Pahich. Dir. John Carpenter, Bryanston Distributing, 1975 My first real film-nerd buddy was named Tom. We went to the same prep school, where our interest in Monty Python, horror movies, & shooting our own productions with Tom's dad's movie camera (not a little Super8 job, either, it had sound) did not earn us invites to the cool kids' parties. Tom had two legs up on me when it came to movies:1.The financial support of his parents. 2.Cable, including Movie Channel. He had access to infinitely more films, uncut films, uncensored films, foreign films - he had a freakin' movie library living inside his TV and his parents didn't care if he stayed up all weekend watching it. Tom had seen many more movies than I, but it wasn't competition. It was friendship - that wondrous sensation of mutual delight when you meet someone who GETS IT. Tom loved to share the films Movie Channel & openminded paren
Post a Comment
Read more

No Return:Stanley Kramer's IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD

 IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD. Spencer Tracy, Ethel Merman, Milton Berle, Mickey Rooney, Sid Caesar. Dir. Stanley Kramer, MGM, 1963 I do not generally write about films I stop watching halfway. What's the point? I either have nothing positive to say about it or was in the wrong mood. In both cases I'm ignorant of its full length to perhaps do it justice. In the case of Stanley Kramer's 1963 comedy smash, however, I feel compelled to make an exception.  My problem with the movie is not my mood, nor disappointment because it's not the movie I once heard. In fact, my biggest problem is that I haven't heard it described in glowing terms, or any, since I was about 9. See, IAMMMMW used to air anually on one or another of the networks, often in December. My parents didn't care for it and never watched it, but my friends watched anytime it aired and talked about it in rapturous terms. Until about 9-10 years old, when it seemed to drop out of conversation, or conv
Post a Comment
Read more

Cuck Fiction: Charles Vidor's GILDA

 Rita Hayworth, Glenn Ford, George MacReady, Steven Geray. Dir. Charles Vidor, Columbia, 1946 My favorite erotic fiction deals with cuckolding. The stories fascinate me. As people, cuckolds don't seem to think they're worth nice things. Or happiness. On the other hand, the cuckolding partners and their multiple lovers don't come over as the clear victors, either. Part of the fascination - maybe most of it - lies in trying to decide which party comes out the MOST degraded.  Is it the submissive, sensitive husband and his unsatisfactory size/staying power? Is it the "slutwife" who finds satiety in being transformed into a fuckdoll to humilate her husband? Or is it the lover - often black - who gets to degrade the sexy white lady but who doesn't otherwise matter? As in bdsm scenes, if the cuck is most degraded, that means he also "wins," as his desires to see his wife turned into a promiscuous slut while he gets to be bi without shame are most fulfi
Post a Comment
Read more