Skip to main content

The Good, the bad, & the meh. CLINT Eastwood's Universal box set

 TWO MULES FOR SISTER SARA

Clint Eastwood, Shirley MacClaine. Dir. Don Sigel, Universal, 1970

Five years ago, my friend Jay, tired of hearing me gripe smoking weed sucked without music, gave me an old 16" TV & a dvd player. I quickly found a wealth of films I wanted/needed to see burdened the shelves of local thrift & dollar stores, so I gave myself standing orders, #2 of which states, "BUY ALL CLINT EASTWOOD TITLES."

In the 70s, as a kid, I saw OUTLAW JOSEY WALES alone at 8, & ESCAPE FROM ALCATRAZ with my dad a few years later. Mom & Dad didn't quite hold with the former TV cowboy, or his later work. Personally, I think they missed what most Eastwood detractors miss: that his archetypal-hero roles all offer wry commentary on the absurdity of one-dimensional heroes. There IS a joke, & Clint's in on it.

After two years, I had copies of all but Clint's Universal releases, lensed before his Malpaso Prod. moved to Warners for life. Comprising a clutch of Clint titles I'd needed to see forever, I broke down & got Clint's Universal Bluray Box for Xmas two years ago, without ever commenting.

I ve decided to classify the films as follows: The Good, The Bad, & The Meh. Only one of the eight sinks as low as "meh," but both Don Seigel's TWO MULES & John Sturges's JOE KIDD more than earn a "bad" rating. Siegel, the B-picture auteur who taught Clint his craft, and Sturges, auteur of THE GREAT ESCAPE, turn in less than their best work, and less than Clint's best performances. Of the two, Siegel at least finds gorgeous cinemtagrophy & a sparks-struck chemistry between Clint & MacClaine. Sturges, years from THE GREAT ESCAPE, fashions a chase movie wherein Eastwood's so obviously right from the first the ensuing 90 minutes only belabor the point.

Clint goes on to do exemplary work at Universal, with Seigel & with his own early work, but JOE KIDD & TWO MULES don't measure up even to Ted Post's AmeriItalian HANG 'EM HIGH. Universal struggled to see Eastwood as anything other than a basic, square-jawed leading man. Clint had other, more interesting ideas, as the others films in this set establish. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

No Return:Stanley Kramer's IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD

 IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD. Spencer Tracy, Ethel Merman, Milton Berle, Mickey Rooney, Sid Caesar. Dir. Stanley Kramer, MGM, 1963 I do not generally write about films I stop watching halfway. What's the point? I either have nothing positive to say about it or was in the wrong mood. In both cases I'm ignorant of its full length to perhaps do it justice. In the case of Stanley Kramer's 1963 comedy smash, however, I feel compelled to make an exception.  My problem with the movie is not my mood, nor disappointment because it's not the movie I once heard. In fact, my biggest problem is that I haven't heard it described in glowing terms, or any, since I was about 9. See, IAMMMMW used to air anually on one or another of the networks, often in December. My parents didn't care for it and never watched it, but my friends watched anytime it aired and talked about it in rapturous terms. Until about 9-10 years old, when it seemed to drop out of conversation, or conv...
Post a Comment
Read more

Junkie-fatigue: Taylor Hackford's Ray

 Jamie Foxx, Kerry Washington, Terence Howard, Warwick Davis, Curtis Armstrong. Dir. Taylor Hackford, Bristol Bay/Universal, 2004 Jamie Foxx, nominated for both Supporting Actor and Best Actor at the 2004 Academy Awards, won Best Actor for Ray and, watching Ray tonight for the first time in about 15 years, I'm glad it went down that way. Tom Cruise gave a career-best performance in Collateral, for which Foxx received his Supporting Actor nod. It's a great performance, too, but no moreso than Cruise, ignored by the Academy, so it feels right to me that Foxx got his statuette for the movie where he didn't share the spotlight with a star of Cruise's magnitude. Not that it would make much difference if Foxx had some high-voltage costar in Ray, because the movie simply doesn't exist without Foxx and his essay of Ray Charles. Not unlike Coal Miner's Daughter, the other music biopic whose star picked up a Best Actor, Ray occurs from Ray's point of view, so ther...
Post a Comment
Read more

Obligatory TL;DR Statement of Purpose

 A not-so-brief explanatory note as to how this blog works: I can't recall a time when movies weren't my passion, my compulsion, my addiction. Ever since my parents took me to see Disney's Bedknobs&Broomsticks, I've been hopeless. Born in 1967, I grew up with free range parents. They took my brother and me to all kinds of movies, often using Hollywood as a babysitter. We saw movies about which many parents today would cluck their tongues (though nothing R-rated until I was 12. My first R-rated movie was MONTY PYTHON'S LIFE OF BRIAN.) Though my parents were professionals and we grew up affluent, our home saw its share of dysfunction. Dad was in the house, but not often present. Mom, stressed and disappointed at discovering her marriage wasn't an equal partnership, took out her frustrations on me.  Without getting too far into the weeds, let me just say my adult life has been far from typical middle class stability. I've never had a career. Never finished ...
3 comments
Read more