Skip to main content

The Good, the bad, & the meh. CLINT Eastwood's Universal box set

 TWO MULES FOR SISTER SARA

Clint Eastwood, Shirley MacClaine. Dir. Don Sigel, Universal, 1970

Five years ago, my friend Jay, tired of hearing me gripe smoking weed sucked without music, gave me an old 16" TV & a dvd player. I quickly found a wealth of films I wanted/needed to see burdened the shelves of local thrift & dollar stores, so I gave myself standing orders, #2 of which states, "BUY ALL CLINT EASTWOOD TITLES."

In the 70s, as a kid, I saw OUTLAW JOSEY WALES alone at 8, & ESCAPE FROM ALCATRAZ with my dad a few years later. Mom & Dad didn't quite hold with the former TV cowboy, or his later work. Personally, I think they missed what most Eastwood detractors miss: that his archetypal-hero roles all offer wry commentary on the absurdity of one-dimensional heroes. There IS a joke, & Clint's in on it.

After two years, I had copies of all but Clint's Universal releases, lensed before his Malpaso Prod. moved to Warners for life. Comprising a clutch of Clint titles I'd needed to see forever, I broke down & got Clint's Universal Bluray Box for Xmas two years ago, without ever commenting.

I ve decided to classify the films as follows: The Good, The Bad, & The Meh. Only one of the eight sinks as low as "meh," but both Don Seigel's TWO MULES & John Sturges's JOE KIDD more than earn a "bad" rating. Siegel, the B-picture auteur who taught Clint his craft, and Sturges, auteur of THE GREAT ESCAPE, turn in less than their best work, and less than Clint's best performances. Of the two, Siegel at least finds gorgeous cinemtagrophy & a sparks-struck chemistry between Clint & MacClaine. Sturges, years from THE GREAT ESCAPE, fashions a chase movie wherein Eastwood's so obviously right from the first the ensuing 90 minutes only belabor the point.

Clint goes on to do exemplary work at Universal, with Seigel & with his own early work, but JOE KIDD & TWO MULES don't measure up even to Ted Post's AmeriItalian HANG 'EM HIGH. Universal struggled to see Eastwood as anything other than a basic, square-jawed leading man. Clint had other, more interesting ideas, as the others films in this set establish. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cuck Fiction: Charles Vidor's GILDA

 Rita Hayworth, Glenn Ford, George MacReady, Steven Geray. Dir. Charles Vidor, Columbia, 1946 My favorite erotic fiction deals with cuckolding. The stories fascinate me. As people, cuckolds don't seem to think they're worth nice things. Or happiness. On the other hand, the cuckolding partners and their multiple lovers don't come over as the clear victors, either. Part of the fascination - maybe most of it - lies in trying to decide which party comes out the MOST degraded.  Is it the submissive, sensitive husband and his unsatisfactory size/staying power? Is it the "slutwife" who finds satiety in being transformed into a fuckdoll to humilate her husband? Or is it the lover - often black - who gets to degrade the sexy white lady but who doesn't otherwise matter? As in bdsm scenes, if the cuck is most degraded, that means he also "wins," as his desires to see his wife turned into a promiscuous slut while he gets to be bi without shame are most fulfi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Personal Movies: Robert Redford's ORDINARY PEOPLE

 Donald Sutherland, Mary Tyler Moore Timothy Hutton, Judd Hitsch. Dir. Robert Redford, Paramount, 1980 I have been fortunate - I suppose that's the word - to see my story on the big screen. Twice. We talk of identifying with movies, with characters, of moviegoing being our identity, but I never went to the movies expecting to see my life reflected back to me. The second time it occurred, with Jonathan Demme's RACHEL GETTING MARRIED, it at least had the benefit of being about a woman, so I can't get all theatrical about how I totes get Rachel. I don't, but I went home from treatment for family events and man, it looked a lot like that movie. The first time it happened, with Robert Redford's directorial debut, ORDINARY PEOPLE, it was a guy, and that guy, if older than my 13 years, lived a life that looked a whole lot like mine, minus the dead brother. In my case, my brother, my parents' biological son, is extravagantly the favorite, and my Mom & I know the...
Post a Comment
Read more

Junkie-fatigue: Taylor Hackford's Ray

 Jamie Foxx, Kerry Washington, Terence Howard, Warwick Davis, Curtis Armstrong. Dir. Taylor Hackford, Bristol Bay/Universal, 2004 Jamie Foxx, nominated for both Supporting Actor and Best Actor at the 2004 Academy Awards, won Best Actor for Ray and, watching Ray tonight for the first time in about 15 years, I'm glad it went down that way. Tom Cruise gave a career-best performance in Collateral, for which Foxx received his Supporting Actor nod. It's a great performance, too, but no moreso than Cruise, ignored by the Academy, so it feels right to me that Foxx got his statuette for the movie where he didn't share the spotlight with a star of Cruise's magnitude. Not that it would make much difference if Foxx had some high-voltage costar in Ray, because the movie simply doesn't exist without Foxx and his essay of Ray Charles. Not unlike Coal Miner's Daughter, the other music biopic whose star picked up a Best Actor, Ray occurs from Ray's point of view, so ther...
Post a Comment
Read more