Skip to main content

Punk's Dead: Paul Rachman's AMERICAN HARDCORE

 Henry Rollins, Ian MacKaye, Keith Morris, H.R. Dir. Paul Rachman, Sony Pictures Classics


As an '80s teen, I loved punk rock. First Wave acts like Sex Pistols and Ramones, hardcore bands like Black Flag, Circle Jerks, and Husker Du - didn't matter to me. If it sounded as angry as I felt, if it moved fast and howled like a cat in heat, if it pissed off my parents or any authority figure close to hand, I loved it and I wanted more. Many of my friends felt much the same but, unlike me, they took it further. Much further.

They went to the Jockey Club, a one-time nightclub/casino in Newport, Ky., and hung out, underage, any night there was a punk show, which was most nights. They got into booze, drugs, sex. They ran away from home, got bounced into early treatment cults like Straight, Inc., dropped out of high school, got pregnant, arrested, and in a few cases dead. Not all of them, of course, but the Greater Cincinnati punk rock scene in the 1980s consisted largely of the kids with whom I grew up and went to school - it might have been an underground, but it wasn't hard to find. If you had a Ramones record and knew someone else who had one, you already had one foot in the scene.

I ran away three times in high school, went to treatment a year after graduating, but none of it has any direct connection to owning a Dead Kennedys T-shirt sophomore year. Despite my own turbulence between 1982 & 1986, I played it safe. My friends who went to the JC every night laughed when I said I had no ID, but I never took the risk. Getting grounded I could deal with - going to juvie, knowing my parents might well leave me there if they could, hard pass. I didn't want to get away from home piecemeal, I wanted to go to college and never return.

Calling myself punk mattered a great deal to me in high school, which today strikes me as remarkable because I never was one. Not really. I listened to the hardcore punk radio show, SEARCH&DESTROY, on the community radio station, listened to hardcore records at friends' houses, saw all-ages shows at Bogart's, the local rock club, but I was never a punk as my friends. I barely owned any real punk records outside of Sex Pistols, Ramones, and Stranglers - First Wave acts, not hardcore. I never wore the uniform, never owned a leather biker jacket, never dyed my hair or pierced my ears, either of which would have gotten me suspended from my Catholic high school if not grounded for life.

Which is not to say a wardrobe or hairstyle defined whether someone was punk, but it's telling in my case. It needs to be, especially as I approach a documentary like Paul Rachman's 2006 AMERICAN HARDCORE. I was around the Cincinnati punk scene, if not in it, and I listened to a lot of the music, so I have some amount of valid personal experience and perspective going in, but it's important to be clear with myself: I was not a punk rocker. This film does not tell my story. I can make no sweeping, generalized pronouncements about it that possess even a shred of credibility.

As an '80s teen I grew tired of how much popular culture centered on Boomers' endless celebration of their glorious '60s youth. I wonder if it still feels as close and as real to them as it did in the '80s. I know that whenever I watch documentaries or even feature films set in that decade it seems impossible that any of it ever happened. AMERICAN HARDCORE contributed to that feeling in me. Thanksgiving weekend of 1987, members of Drunk Injuns and Doggy Style, two Southern California hardcore bands, the former fronted by The Adolescents' Rikk Agnew, stayed in my parents' house after playing a Jockey Club gig. Despite several of those who stayed in my house appearing in the movie, the era doesn't seem any more possible than ever.

In the UK, punk came from the working class. In the US, hardcore came largely from the suburban middle class. For all that the police hated and harrassed punks, for all those who did get into trouble, even for all those who died young, most people I know who got deeply into the scene now lead quiet, conventional middle class lives. Punk rockers like to talk about police and even government harrassment, but much of the hardcore era looks now like a case study in privilege. Sure, white punks got maced and worse by the police, even went to jail on occasion, but imagine the police reaction to an out-of-control, overcrowded hip hop show. Heck, we don't have to imagine. We have microfilm.

Some who critiqued AMERICAN HARDCORE did so from the perspective that it's a study of white male rage and privilege. In one sense, that's silly - hardcore punk between 1980-1986 largely WAS an all-male, majority-white proposition so criticizing it for being about what it has to be about doesn't make much sense. On the other hand, neither the filmmakers nor any of the musicians and others interviewed ever reflects on how extraordinarily UN-oppressed and interfered-with their subculture was, particularly compared to what people of color and those on the LGBTQ+ spectrum faced. For a movement supposedly about resistance and protest of the American status quo, that's a mindboggling disconnect.

Of course, as director Paul Rachman points out in his commentary, punk mostly rebelled against/reacted to "bad music," a charge echoed by most of the film's talking heads in its first section. Listening to guys like Rollins and MacKaye and Morris grouse about that music only drove home to me their privilege - they may have resented Reagan, but what drove them to pick up instruments was Album Oriented Radio, hardly the face of oppression. It also drove home to me how well some of that bad music stands up compared to the average Minor Threat record. Sure, Peter Frampton bit it, but as artist after artist railed against Fleetwood Mac I kept wishing my copy of RUMORS still played.

All of this reads like a bad review and that's a mistake. AMERICAN HARDCORE mostly works, covering the roots of the subgenre, the important acts like Black Flag and Bad Brains, the regional scenes, the Do It Yourself and Straight Edge ethos so crucial in the Washington, D.C. scene, and speaking to almost anyone still alive from those days, though Husker Du's Bob Mould is notable by his absence. It's an effective, heartfelt look back at a subculture and its passions.

Toward the end, as the various talking heads discuss the end of the golden age of hardcore, they come at it from the angle that the touring and struggling burned everyone out. It did, but the movie talks around what had begun to happen musically, namely that bands like Black Flag, Meat Puppets, and Husker Du all began writing slow and midtempo songs which incorporated the influence of classic rock acts like Grateful Dead and Black Sabbath. Hard-fast-loud music proved as unsustainable as the lifestyle. At a certain point, musicians branch out and experiment, rebelling against the rebellion. All art does, but AMERICAN HARDCORE shies away from this conclusion.

AMERICAN HARDCORE is not at all a bad documentary. It's mostly pretty great. It offers a narrative that feels incomplete, and possibly that on purpose. For such a seething, vibrant scene, Rachman does a better job of presenting the parts most interesting to him and his conclusions. I suppose that's true of all documentary, but it's a liability, and a troubling one, in this case. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Friday Flop: Adrian Lyne's 9&1/2 WEEKS

 Kim Basinger, Mickey Rourke. Dir. Adrian Lyne, MGM, 1986 Style over sex, minus substance. That's a glib summation/dismissal of Adrian Lyne's 1986 blockbuster erotic drama, but it's not unfair or inaccurate. I took copious notes on this movie, most relating to some way Lyne and screenwriter Zalman King failed to make the film daring, dark, perverse, bold, or even a little erotic.  I noted, many times, that as an artifact of Hollywood's attempt to make sex-movies for an adult audience after home video made hardcore porn available to everyone, 9&1/2 WEEKS fascinates and depresses in equal measure. It's aesthetically fascinating, sociologically depressing. Lyne delivers a hyperstylized, superficial imagining of the US audience's "freaky" side and it's all pretty standard, you're-not-kinky-if-you-use-the-word-kinky kind of stuff.  Allegedly dom/sub-themed, both the film and the fantasies it trades in define predictable. A little gaslighting...

Grasshoppers & Nazis: Bob Fosse's Cabaret

 Liza Minelli, Michael York, Joel Grey, Fritz Weppert. Dir. Bob Fosse, Warner Bros., 1972 Once upon a time in the '80s, I wrote a paper for a college English class deconstructing the fable of the ant and the grasshopper, coming down on the side of the grasshopper with both feet. The grasshopper, I argued, is humankind's wanderlust, its irrepressible need to go new places and meet people and have adventures with them (or at least drinks), to be in and of moments, to laugh and feel good and not worry, and that, I argued, is the best of us. We need the grasshoppers to remind us life is beautiful when it is lived.  Back then, I hung around with grasshoppers, though I'm not sure I was one. The real grasshoppers I knew took to the air and seldom, if ever, returned. Their adventures took them everywhere but back to Short Vine Street, Cincinnati, anytime between 1987 & 1993. I loved to hear their wild tales when they did alight there again for a few days, but I had to make su...

No Return:Stanley Kramer's IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD

 IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD. Spencer Tracy, Ethel Merman, Milton Berle, Mickey Rooney, Sid Caesar. Dir. Stanley Kramer, MGM, 1963 I do not generally write about films I stop watching halfway. What's the point? I either have nothing positive to say about it or was in the wrong mood. In both cases I'm ignorant of its full length to perhaps do it justice. In the case of Stanley Kramer's 1963 comedy smash, however, I feel compelled to make an exception.  My problem with the movie is not my mood, nor disappointment because it's not the movie I once heard. In fact, my biggest problem is that I haven't heard it described in glowing terms, or any, since I was about 9. See, IAMMMMW used to air anually on one or another of the networks, often in December. My parents didn't care for it and never watched it, but my friends watched anytime it aired and talked about it in rapturous terms. Until about 9-10 years old, when it seemed to drop out of conversation, or conv...