Skip to main content

Godlike: John Ford's FORT APACHE

 Henry Fonda, John Wayne, Shirley Temple, John Agar. Dir. John Ford, Fox, 1948


Setting aside Disney's THE APPLE DUMPLING GANG, my first westerns were THE OUTLAW JOSEY WALES and LITTLE BIG MAN. Given that, it does not surprise me that I gravitate to the revisionist western, often without consciously realizing it. I always thought of it as loving the underdog, but in all my favorite westerns the underdog is always the outlaw, the Native American, the figures the traditional western employs as its stock villains. Growing up in the shadow of Watergate and the end of the Vietnam War, it's perhaps a natural inclination to prefer the movies that questioned and/or rejected the common, received wisdom about the Old West.

Yesterday felt like a good day to watch westerns. As a child, the independent TV stations in my hometown tended to feature westerns on their weekend movie-blocks. Saturday and Sunday afternoons sing out to me to watch genre films, from THE SEARCHERS to DIRTY HARRY to THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL, but especially the westerns. So, picking at random (I thought) I selected two classic and two underappreciated westerns with one thing in common: they're all antihero pictures, all revisionist westerns.

The running joke in this blog, up until now, has been that its address is Johnfordisgod.blogspot.com and yet it contains no writeups of any of Ford's pictures. That's attributable to sheer laziness on my part. I don't own a laptop or desktop. I do all this with my $65 Straight Talk burner, with which copying and pasting any of the hundreds of movies I've written up on Facebook over the last four years - at least 15 of them Ford titles - has proven impossible. Our local library restricts access to Gmail, Facebook, twitter, and Letterboxd and the University's library has been closed to non-students ever since the pandemic started last year, so I'm having to write all-new pieces on films I already wrote about with passion once. Don't know about anyone reading this but duplication of effort makes me a little crazier than usual.

Seen for my first time last Spring, FORT APACHE merits more than one effort. I grew up knowing about Gen. George Armstrong Custer and Sitting Bull and Little Big Horn, but not with the mythology of Custer-as-martyr in America's westward expansion. I think the best that can be said of the histories I encountered is they tended to be ambivalent about Custer. By the time I visited the Custer Memorial with my family when I was eight, I already understood Gen. Custer as a victim of his own hubris rather than some sort of tragic hero to revere.

I got lucky there. To many who saw FORT APACHE on its release in 1948, Custer defined the ideals of the romantic hero and great patriot. John Ford, a close student of US history, was having none of it, making what is largely recognized as the first American motion picture to see Custer as an incompetent ass who got his entire company massacred.

He does so in his own classic style, establishing his one enduring theme - the loss of community/family's effects on the individual - by spending the picture's first half building the world of a US cavalry outpost: the officers' wives and families, their social customs, and the low-comedy antics of the noncoms and recruits (played by Ford Stock Company regulars like Victor McLagen, Hank Worden, and Pedro Armandariz.) As in any Ford film, we know this community will be at least shaken to its core if not outright destroyed, but unlike many of his westerns the destroyers are not marauding Native Americans or black-hat gunslingers but the main character of the piece.

That character, Ford's stand-in for Custer, Lt. Col. Owen Thirsby, may be the main character but he's not the hero. Henry Fonda plays Thirsby as a Civil War hero whose dreams of glory, stymied by post-Civil War politics, have turned him into an embittered, brittle man always ready to blame others for his own failings, always certain of his own infallibility, never willing to hear opposing points of view even when he clearly doesn't understand his situation. Early in the movie, Thirsby assures his officers he is not "a martinet," before proceeding to give the lie to that claim in his every word and action. Fonda, one of our best actors, plays Thirsby as a humorless snob, a man with a Monument Valley-sized stick up his ass, a man absolutely sure his shit doesn't stink even as his officers walk around holding their noses. It's a career-defining performance in a career filled with same, from Ford's THE GRAPES OF WRATH to Mervyn LeRoy's MISTER ROBERTS to Leone's ONCE UPON A TIME IN THE WEST to Mark Rydell's ON GOLDEN POND.

John Wayne's Capt. Kirby York is FORT APACHE's true hero and it's one of my favorite Wayne performances. By 1956's THE SEARCHERS Wayne had perfected his enraged-man persona yet in FORT APACHE, where rage would be the minimum reaction to a vain and self-destructive force like Thirsby, Wayne doesn't come across angry, and he does not swagger. He's the soul both of Fort Apache's community as well as of the movie, itself. Wayne always did his best work with Ford, and Kirby York runs in a dead heat with THE SEARCHERS' Ethan Edwards as Wayne's acme.

Shirley Temple, who had worked with Ford previously on WEE WILLIE WINKY, only did two roles as an adult before retiring to concentrate on a career in public service, and her role as Philadelphia Thirsby, Owen's headstrong daughter, makes me wonder what might have been. She's terrific here, all those years as a child star paying off in a seemingly effortless, naturalistic performance which sees her make mincemeat of poor John Agar, her on- & off-screen suitor. Married for only a couple years, the two don't have to act at all to show the audience how crazy they are for each other.

Then, as now, audiences know Custer's fate going into the picture. That helps cement Ford's reputation as perhaps the greatest director in Golden Age Hollywood for me, because FORT APACHE's final battle sequence and Cochise's charge at Thirsby's pinned-down command leaves me breathless. To know what's coming, in a general way, and yet still feel devastated by the specific vision is one of the great pleasures of being a film fan, and particularly a Ford lover. Though THE SEARCHERS is often cited as Ford's magnum opus, I have to give FORT APACHE the edge. Between the two, I had to completely rethink my top ten films of all time. Whatever one thinks of Ford - his cult of haters must rival his cult of admirers in both size and vitriol - it's impossible for me not to credit him with redirecting the conversation about Custer as a great American hero. Which makes FORT APACHE not only one of the great revisionist westerns but one of the more important films in US history. I did not choose Johnfordisgod as my email addy and blog name on a whim.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No Return:Stanley Kramer's IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD

 IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD. Spencer Tracy, Ethel Merman, Milton Berle, Mickey Rooney, Sid Caesar. Dir. Stanley Kramer, MGM, 1963 I do not generally write about films I stop watching halfway. What's the point? I either have nothing positive to say about it or was in the wrong mood. In both cases I'm ignorant of its full length to perhaps do it justice. In the case of Stanley Kramer's 1963 comedy smash, however, I feel compelled to make an exception.  My problem with the movie is not my mood, nor disappointment because it's not the movie I once heard. In fact, my biggest problem is that I haven't heard it described in glowing terms, or any, since I was about 9. See, IAMMMMW used to air anually on one or another of the networks, often in December. My parents didn't care for it and never watched it, but my friends watched anytime it aired and talked about it in rapturous terms. Until about 9-10 years old, when it seemed to drop out of conversation, or conv...

Junkie-fatigue: Taylor Hackford's Ray

 Jamie Foxx, Kerry Washington, Terence Howard, Warwick Davis, Curtis Armstrong. Dir. Taylor Hackford, Bristol Bay/Universal, 2004 Jamie Foxx, nominated for both Supporting Actor and Best Actor at the 2004 Academy Awards, won Best Actor for Ray and, watching Ray tonight for the first time in about 15 years, I'm glad it went down that way. Tom Cruise gave a career-best performance in Collateral, for which Foxx received his Supporting Actor nod. It's a great performance, too, but no moreso than Cruise, ignored by the Academy, so it feels right to me that Foxx got his statuette for the movie where he didn't share the spotlight with a star of Cruise's magnitude. Not that it would make much difference if Foxx had some high-voltage costar in Ray, because the movie simply doesn't exist without Foxx and his essay of Ray Charles. Not unlike Coal Miner's Daughter, the other music biopic whose star picked up a Best Actor, Ray occurs from Ray's point of view, so ther...

Obligatory TL;DR Statement of Purpose

 A not-so-brief explanatory note as to how this blog works: I can't recall a time when movies weren't my passion, my compulsion, my addiction. Ever since my parents took me to see Disney's Bedknobs&Broomsticks, I've been hopeless. Born in 1967, I grew up with free range parents. They took my brother and me to all kinds of movies, often using Hollywood as a babysitter. We saw movies about which many parents today would cluck their tongues (though nothing R-rated until I was 12. My first R-rated movie was MONTY PYTHON'S LIFE OF BRIAN.) Though my parents were professionals and we grew up affluent, our home saw its share of dysfunction. Dad was in the house, but not often present. Mom, stressed and disappointed at discovering her marriage wasn't an equal partnership, took out her frustrations on me.  Without getting too far into the weeds, let me just say my adult life has been far from typical middle class stability. I've never had a career. Never finished ...