Skip to main content

The unusual suspects: Daniel Alfredson's Kidnapping Mr. Heineken

 Sam Worthington Jim Sturgess Anthony Hopkins. Dir. Daniel Alfredson, Alchemy, 2015


Jim Sturgess, Sam Worthington, and their two best mates are stereotypical English Lads, living abroad in Amsterdam, where they own a successful contstruction company. Fluctuations in the market force them to sell their assets to meet payroll, sending them to a bank seeking a loan. The bank unjustly declines to lend money to the Lads, whose personal, now-sold, assets consisted not of bonds and portfolios but sports cars, pleasure boats, and race horses. Denied access to more of same, what are four victims of oppression, and likely Lads, to do?

Why, kidnap Freddy Heineken, the man who made Heineken ale a billion-dollar brand and ransom him for £35M, of course. What else?

If you're thinking our protagonists sound like less than put-upon victims of injustice and more like entitled prats with a deeply challenged sense of morality, welcome to Daniel Alfredson's clever, stylish Eurothriller, Kidnapping Mr. Heineken, in which the action, seen from the point of view of the Lads, doesn't make them look all that heroic, which seems strange since they're the main characters.

Therein lies Alfredson's sly trick. We see the events from the POV of the main characters, yes, but not the protagonists or the heroes. The protagonist is Hopkins, a shrewd businessman and judge of human character, whose occasional editorial comments to his abuctors lay bare all their narcissism, their duplicity, and their inability to trust one another. Hopkins simply points out to them, and us, what should have been immediately obvious: guys who kidnap a person so they can buy more Ferraris are unlikely to make reliable partners in a criminal enterprise. Lo and behold, he's right.

From the moment of his abduction, Hopkins's words and presence overshadows and dictates virtually all the story, which turns into a long, tense, paranoid exercise in the inevitable. The friends turn on one another, abandon each other, rob one another and, divided by their greed and suspicion, they fall, one by one. The two who last the longest, the leaders, played by Sturgess and Worthington, fall farthest, as the real-life figures got out of prison and took over the Dutch underworld in the 1990s, but the point is made. Willingness to do evil, and doing it, changes people, or perhaps makes them more who they were all along, but no one emerges unscathed. It's not possible to do bad things and remain a good person, even if you want to, and even if you don't believe you're evil. Wrong is wrong, even if you seem like a swell guy.

It's not a wildly original set of conclusions - Crime doesn't pay because people who commit crimes are criminals not fun dudes - but it's a somewhat original way to arrive at them and, if the Hopkins scenes (almost certainly shot separately and edited together later) remind us strongly of Hannibal Lecter in Silence of the Lambs, it's an homage which also serves Alfredson's agenda. Alfredson, who directed two of the Swedish versions of Stieg Larsson's Lizbeth Salander trilogy, certainly knows how to make your basic slick, atmospheric Eurothriller. I watched it first on a Saturday of all action movies and it's not really an action movie, but it's an effective character study, morality play, and psychological long con rolled into one good-looking, fast-moving film. Not transcendant, but better than average. The kind of movie that names this blog. I wasn't looking for Kidnapping Mr. Heineken, but I'm happy I found it along the way. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Friday Flop: Adrian Lyne's 9&1/2 WEEKS

 Kim Basinger, Mickey Rourke. Dir. Adrian Lyne, MGM, 1986 Style over sex, minus substance. That's a glib summation/dismissal of Adrian Lyne's 1986 blockbuster erotic drama, but it's not unfair or inaccurate. I took copious notes on this movie, most relating to some way Lyne and screenwriter Zalman King failed to make the film daring, dark, perverse, bold, or even a little erotic.  I noted, many times, that as an artifact of Hollywood's attempt to make sex-movies for an adult audience after home video made hardcore porn available to everyone, 9&1/2 WEEKS fascinates and depresses in equal measure. It's aesthetically fascinating, sociologically depressing. Lyne delivers a hyperstylized, superficial imagining of the US audience's "freaky" side and it's all pretty standard, you're-not-kinky-if-you-use-the-word-kinky kind of stuff.  Allegedly dom/sub-themed, both the film and the fantasies it trades in define predictable. A little gaslighting...

Grasshoppers & Nazis: Bob Fosse's Cabaret

 Liza Minelli, Michael York, Joel Grey, Fritz Weppert. Dir. Bob Fosse, Warner Bros., 1972 Once upon a time in the '80s, I wrote a paper for a college English class deconstructing the fable of the ant and the grasshopper, coming down on the side of the grasshopper with both feet. The grasshopper, I argued, is humankind's wanderlust, its irrepressible need to go new places and meet people and have adventures with them (or at least drinks), to be in and of moments, to laugh and feel good and not worry, and that, I argued, is the best of us. We need the grasshoppers to remind us life is beautiful when it is lived.  Back then, I hung around with grasshoppers, though I'm not sure I was one. The real grasshoppers I knew took to the air and seldom, if ever, returned. Their adventures took them everywhere but back to Short Vine Street, Cincinnati, anytime between 1987 & 1993. I loved to hear their wild tales when they did alight there again for a few days, but I had to make su...

No Return:Stanley Kramer's IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD

 IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD. Spencer Tracy, Ethel Merman, Milton Berle, Mickey Rooney, Sid Caesar. Dir. Stanley Kramer, MGM, 1963 I do not generally write about films I stop watching halfway. What's the point? I either have nothing positive to say about it or was in the wrong mood. In both cases I'm ignorant of its full length to perhaps do it justice. In the case of Stanley Kramer's 1963 comedy smash, however, I feel compelled to make an exception.  My problem with the movie is not my mood, nor disappointment because it's not the movie I once heard. In fact, my biggest problem is that I haven't heard it described in glowing terms, or any, since I was about 9. See, IAMMMMW used to air anually on one or another of the networks, often in December. My parents didn't care for it and never watched it, but my friends watched anytime it aired and talked about it in rapturous terms. Until about 9-10 years old, when it seemed to drop out of conversation, or conv...