Skip to main content

The death of objectivity: James Bobin's The Muppets

 Jason Segel, Amy Adams, Chris Cooper, Rashida Jones. Dir. James Bobin, Disney, 2011


I need to say, at the start, that whether or not I'm qualified to write about Jason Segel's 2011 reboot of The Muppets, I am not remotely objective. I am fairly sure I cannot be. I was a toddler when Sesame Steet made its public television debut. I would not know about stations airing Popeye and old Looney Tunes shorts until elementary school. My earliest TV memories involve Kermit the Frog, when he starred on PBS not his syndicated TV. The syndicated show is, of course, a touchstone of my tweenhood, as are the first two feature films. We owned Sesame Street-branded merchandise - Kermit's face was a constant part of the first 14 years of my life. No, I won't be giving you objectivity - I sobbed when Kermit plucked the first notes to "Rainbow Connection."

Deduct a few points for terrible original songs, composed by Flight of the Conchords's Bret MacKenzie, and two more for giving Amy Adams nothing to do other than sparkle. After that, I've no complaints. It works. The tone remains cheerfully, even frantically, absurd, the story the traditional kitchen-sink/Vaudeville barrage of satire, self-reference, and silliness. At the same time, Segel makes some nice, uplifting comments about finding identity and strength in community that help keep The Muppets out of the realm of a merchandising cash-in.

So what went wrong? How come we didn't see Segel and Kermit and Walter and the gang every couple years after 2011, back in a new swashbuckling adventure? Why didn't The Muppets turn into yet another Disney-owned franchise-machine?

I will submit that nothing went wrong. The Muppets' basic storyline, a ragtag yet likeminded group of neglected toys team up together and take Tinseltown by storm, doesn't lend itself to an ongoing narrative the way superheroes and Star Wars do. There is no automatic, obvious sequel to a Muppets movie. Look at a Disney property like High School Musical. They made four of those, and by the fourth time the gang found reason to put on a show they'd done all with the idea they could. A Muppets franchise faces the same problem. These aren't the days of Andy Hardy - an audience wants more than yet another reason to put on a show. Segel does everything a Muppets fan could want with his reimagining, and having done that, what remains? What's the followup?

The Muppets, particularly in the context of Disney, could possibly work as some kind of continuing TV series. As fearure films, about the most to do is reboot the franchise for a new generation every decade or so, and in that case Disney can simply re-air the original pictures as nostalgic reissues via their streaming platforms rather than invest dozens of millions in a reboot with no obvious future.

It has been ten years since Segel's re-start. I've heard no word Disney plans to reinvent The Muppets soon, but there's no immediate rush. Segel's version makes a worthy addition to the canon. Between the films and the reissued show, there's plenty of Muppet material to enjoy. I'd prefer that to an ongoing new "Muppets in Space" series. 

Comments

  1. The Red Queen (Sascha Ball)May 9, 2021 at 6:05 PM

    They've announced a Halloween special. I'm very excited.

    ReplyDelete
  2. EllieMay 17, 2021 at 1:10 PM

    The only Muppets I've ever seen was the Christmas Carol one, which is a fixture at my in laws' on Christmas Eve, but that one is very charming. I do not know how I managed an entire childhood in the eighties without forming a Muppet connection, but then, I was a strange child. This sounds delightful.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Friday Flop: Adrian Lyne's 9&1/2 WEEKS

 Kim Basinger, Mickey Rourke. Dir. Adrian Lyne, MGM, 1986 Style over sex, minus substance. That's a glib summation/dismissal of Adrian Lyne's 1986 blockbuster erotic drama, but it's not unfair or inaccurate. I took copious notes on this movie, most relating to some way Lyne and screenwriter Zalman King failed to make the film daring, dark, perverse, bold, or even a little erotic.  I noted, many times, that as an artifact of Hollywood's attempt to make sex-movies for an adult audience after home video made hardcore porn available to everyone, 9&1/2 WEEKS fascinates and depresses in equal measure. It's aesthetically fascinating, sociologically depressing. Lyne delivers a hyperstylized, superficial imagining of the US audience's "freaky" side and it's all pretty standard, you're-not-kinky-if-you-use-the-word-kinky kind of stuff.  Allegedly dom/sub-themed, both the film and the fantasies it trades in define predictable. A little gaslighting...
Post a Comment
Read more

Grasshoppers & Nazis: Bob Fosse's Cabaret

 Liza Minelli, Michael York, Joel Grey, Fritz Weppert. Dir. Bob Fosse, Warner Bros., 1972 Once upon a time in the '80s, I wrote a paper for a college English class deconstructing the fable of the ant and the grasshopper, coming down on the side of the grasshopper with both feet. The grasshopper, I argued, is humankind's wanderlust, its irrepressible need to go new places and meet people and have adventures with them (or at least drinks), to be in and of moments, to laugh and feel good and not worry, and that, I argued, is the best of us. We need the grasshoppers to remind us life is beautiful when it is lived.  Back then, I hung around with grasshoppers, though I'm not sure I was one. The real grasshoppers I knew took to the air and seldom, if ever, returned. Their adventures took them everywhere but back to Short Vine Street, Cincinnati, anytime between 1987 & 1993. I loved to hear their wild tales when they did alight there again for a few days, but I had to make su...
Post a Comment
Read more

No Return:Stanley Kramer's IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD

 IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD. Spencer Tracy, Ethel Merman, Milton Berle, Mickey Rooney, Sid Caesar. Dir. Stanley Kramer, MGM, 1963 I do not generally write about films I stop watching halfway. What's the point? I either have nothing positive to say about it or was in the wrong mood. In both cases I'm ignorant of its full length to perhaps do it justice. In the case of Stanley Kramer's 1963 comedy smash, however, I feel compelled to make an exception.  My problem with the movie is not my mood, nor disappointment because it's not the movie I once heard. In fact, my biggest problem is that I haven't heard it described in glowing terms, or any, since I was about 9. See, IAMMMMW used to air anually on one or another of the networks, often in December. My parents didn't care for it and never watched it, but my friends watched anytime it aired and talked about it in rapturous terms. Until about 9-10 years old, when it seemed to drop out of conversation, or conv...
Post a Comment
Read more