Skip to main content

The death of objectivity: James Bobin's The Muppets

 Jason Segel, Amy Adams, Chris Cooper, Rashida Jones. Dir. James Bobin, Disney, 2011


I need to say, at the start, that whether or not I'm qualified to write about Jason Segel's 2011 reboot of The Muppets, I am not remotely objective. I am fairly sure I cannot be. I was a toddler when Sesame Steet made its public television debut. I would not know about stations airing Popeye and old Looney Tunes shorts until elementary school. My earliest TV memories involve Kermit the Frog, when he starred on PBS not his syndicated TV. The syndicated show is, of course, a touchstone of my tweenhood, as are the first two feature films. We owned Sesame Street-branded merchandise - Kermit's face was a constant part of the first 14 years of my life. No, I won't be giving you objectivity - I sobbed when Kermit plucked the first notes to "Rainbow Connection."

Deduct a few points for terrible original songs, composed by Flight of the Conchords's Bret MacKenzie, and two more for giving Amy Adams nothing to do other than sparkle. After that, I've no complaints. It works. The tone remains cheerfully, even frantically, absurd, the story the traditional kitchen-sink/Vaudeville barrage of satire, self-reference, and silliness. At the same time, Segel makes some nice, uplifting comments about finding identity and strength in community that help keep The Muppets out of the realm of a merchandising cash-in.

So what went wrong? How come we didn't see Segel and Kermit and Walter and the gang every couple years after 2011, back in a new swashbuckling adventure? Why didn't The Muppets turn into yet another Disney-owned franchise-machine?

I will submit that nothing went wrong. The Muppets' basic storyline, a ragtag yet likeminded group of neglected toys team up together and take Tinseltown by storm, doesn't lend itself to an ongoing narrative the way superheroes and Star Wars do. There is no automatic, obvious sequel to a Muppets movie. Look at a Disney property like High School Musical. They made four of those, and by the fourth time the gang found reason to put on a show they'd done all with the idea they could. A Muppets franchise faces the same problem. These aren't the days of Andy Hardy - an audience wants more than yet another reason to put on a show. Segel does everything a Muppets fan could want with his reimagining, and having done that, what remains? What's the followup?

The Muppets, particularly in the context of Disney, could possibly work as some kind of continuing TV series. As fearure films, about the most to do is reboot the franchise for a new generation every decade or so, and in that case Disney can simply re-air the original pictures as nostalgic reissues via their streaming platforms rather than invest dozens of millions in a reboot with no obvious future.

It has been ten years since Segel's re-start. I've heard no word Disney plans to reinvent The Muppets soon, but there's no immediate rush. Segel's version makes a worthy addition to the canon. Between the films and the reissued show, there's plenty of Muppet material to enjoy. I'd prefer that to an ongoing new "Muppets in Space" series. 

Comments

  1. The Red Queen (Sascha Ball)May 9, 2021 at 6:05 PM

    They've announced a Halloween special. I'm very excited.

    ReplyDelete
  2. EllieMay 17, 2021 at 1:10 PM

    The only Muppets I've ever seen was the Christmas Carol one, which is a fixture at my in laws' on Christmas Eve, but that one is very charming. I do not know how I managed an entire childhood in the eighties without forming a Muppet connection, but then, I was a strange child. This sounds delightful.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mediocre be thy name: John Gulager's Zombie Night

 Anthony Michael Hall, Daryl Hannah, Alan Ruck, Shirley Jones. Dir. John Gulager, The Asylum, 2013 For those unaware, The Asylum is a film production company specializing in cheapo horror and action titles, most subgeneric ripoffs of whatever horror/scifi/action titles are popular that year. Referred to as "mockbusters," these low budget achievers look like their big-money brethren, often featuring solid B-list casts, as Zombie Night does. Though The Asylum has attracted a following, the more serious, hardcore fans of el cheapo horror (et al) tend to turn up their noses at most Asylum product. Marc Edward Heuck, Our Man in the Valley, summed it up thusly: "I don't watch much Asylum fare, because frankly they're not awful enough, they're just mediocre. Like, they're not content to just have the monster or the topless girl and the requisite scenes therein and otherwise leave talent alone to be unique like Roger Corman was, they micro-manage all the pe...
Post a Comment
Read more

I love Twinkies: Tommy Lee Wallace's IT

 Harry Anderson, Richard Thomas, Dennis Christopher, Tim Reid, Annette O'Toole, Tim Curry. Dir. Tommy Lee Wallace, Warner Bros., 1990 I had one problem with the 1990 TV movie (run over two nights back in '90, NBC called it a miniseries, but as a dvd-feature it runs three hours and six minutes, a little longer than Avengers:End Game) and it's a big one. I loved all the stuff with the cast as kids, in the first part. Only Seth Green among them went on to be household-name actors and their anonymity at this remove gave their performances a spontanaeity and freshness that helped me buy them as screen versions of the novel's characters. The adult versions, essayed by an ensemble of B-listers and small screen stars, however, didn't do much for me.  I'm willing to lay that off on a poor screenplay to some extent, but IT proves definitively that Harry Anderson, despite two hit sitcoms, cannot act. At all. It goes on to prove that Richard Thomas, Dennis Christopher, An...
1 comment
Read more

Cuck Fiction: Charles Vidor's GILDA

 Rita Hayworth, Glenn Ford, George MacReady, Steven Geray. Dir. Charles Vidor, Columbia, 1946 My favorite erotic fiction deals with cuckolding. The stories fascinate me. As people, cuckolds don't seem to think they're worth nice things. Or happiness. On the other hand, the cuckolding partners and their multiple lovers don't come over as the clear victors, either. Part of the fascination - maybe most of it - lies in trying to decide which party comes out the MOST degraded.  Is it the submissive, sensitive husband and his unsatisfactory size/staying power? Is it the "slutwife" who finds satiety in being transformed into a fuckdoll to humilate her husband? Or is it the lover - often black - who gets to degrade the sexy white lady but who doesn't otherwise matter? As in bdsm scenes, if the cuck is most degraded, that means he also "wins," as his desires to see his wife turned into a promiscuous slut while he gets to be bi without shame are most fulfi...
Post a Comment
Read more