Skip to main content

The F@&%ing G*#*@mn Best Picture of '77: Woody Allen's Annie Hall

 Woody Allen, Diane Keaton, Tony Roberts, Carol Kane, Paul Simon. Dir. Woody Allen, United Artists, 1977


In spring of 1978, Annie Hall won the Academy Award for Best Picture of 1977. I was ten years old. Among Annie Hall's competitors in '78 was a little movie called Star Wars which was, as I knew perfectly well, the best movie of 1977 and every other year ever. When Annie Hall won Best Picture, I knew Satan owned the Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences. I cast a supremely disapproving and suspicious eye upon Annie Hall. Which, for a movie fan of the late '70s and early '80s, when Woody Allen did his most consistent work, soon became a problem. How did I avoid a movie everyone I met said was one of the funniest films they'd ever seen?

I got lucky, I guess. I managed to avoid Annie Hall until the late '80s. When I did see it, I had to agree - it's the best movie of 1977. It's ok, though. Star Wars is the best movie in all of recorded history. I hope Mr. Allen likes looking at his Oscar.

Again, the silence following a great movie. In a moment I'll write other things but what is there to say right now that Woody Allen didn't spend the last 90 minutes saying? What is there for me to add after, "We keep going through it...because we need the eggs"?

One of my favorite albums is Lou Reed's New York. The writing is Lou at his crispest and yet also warmest, the lyrical ideas and melodies sound fresh, his guitar playing has seldom been better, and his voice and how he uses it on a song are in top form. Still, the record devotes much of its concerns to issues topical in 1988, the year of its recording and a true hell-year in the US, which dates the record in ways a more contemporary audience might find offputting. If so, it's a loss, as New York represents the high water mark of Reed's career.

Annie Hall is my film equivalent of New York. It's a movie totally of its time. That's a time I witnessed, if not understood, and Allen's take on where we were at in '77 speaks to me in a way it may not to younger audiences. My friends obsess over finding therapists in-network, not over their analysis of my friends' sex lives. Do the preoccupations and cultural references of 1977 resonate with younger movie fans?

It's not hard, in either case, to see where they wouldn't, and in both cases it's a damn shame if true. Annie Hall is almost certainly Allen's best, most fully realized, most absurdly profound work. In it, he fuses his high- and lowbrow sensibilities, as perfectly summed up in his opening shot, where he uses a rather arty, faux-documentary style to tell two Borscht Belt groaners which he says define his approach to life. It's intellectual, it's crass, it's existential, and it's ludicrous. The ideal Allen cocktail. 

John Ford and Orson Welles both believed a production could, even should, encompass high art and low, broad, ribald comedy. Allen graduated from the same school, his rapidfire dialogue zinging from Marshall McCluhan references to dick jokes to Jewish-mother impersonations. Allen deconstructs late-20th century man while wearing a Groucho mask. It's a hard mixture to get right. Daryl F. Zanuck, Fox's head of production, despaired of Ford's fondness for the cruder comedy. Annie Hall measures up to Zanuck's standard, "farce, not hokum."

I hope Annie Hall still finds an audience, too, because it's one of those years Oscar got it exactly right. Star Wars was unlike anything we'd seen, it changed Hollywood overnight, and its aftershocks continued well into 1978. But it's not Annie Hall. 

It doesn't make me want to sit in the stillness and just vibrate like a struck tuning fork, the tremors from the experience fading out long and slow. Star Wars says a lot to me, means a lot, but it has never told me about life and love and men and neurosis what Annie Hall told me about them. Star Wars is historically relevant, economically relevant, even creatively relevant, but it's not emotionally or, dare I say it, spiritually relevant to me like Annie Hall.

Star Wars fulfills me in a very personal way. It rings bells and toots whistles with which I have adorned it in the first place. It's less a film than a personal talisman, playing its role in a ritualistic love affair. Annie Hall, on the other hand, is a great motion picture, a sublimity of form and an apotheosis of craft, all of film's elements blended in proportion so exquisite it feels like the reading of an epic poem by the conclusion. Like you've discovered art, and it is good. Star Wars is 100% adrenalized fun. Annie Hall is existential joy. Star Wars is one of my personal passions and compulsions. Annie Hall is one of America's finest movies.

Comments

  1. I am here with good news for you, which is this: I was born in 1978, never saw New York until the early nineties, did not have much experience with the kind of neurotic Jewish culture he describes or the empty LA culture he parodies later, and none of that made any difference: I loved this film and love it still. Your tuning-fork analogy is perfection: it's like that. Lines from this movie come up in my mind all the time that are very culturally specific but which, if you know even the littlest thing about what they refer to, can be extrapolated to larger ideas. "They merged Commentary and Dissent and now it's called Dysentery"--bad paraphrase but you know the line--sums up a world view while being very funny all at once. I could go on. And dumb throwaways somehow are so funny. "Nice car. You keep it nice. Is this a sandwich?" That's easy but it still makes me laugh. Anyway, I love, love, love this movie and it makes no difference that I only tangentially experienced anything it talks about.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Friday Flop: Adrian Lyne's 9&1/2 WEEKS

 Kim Basinger, Mickey Rourke. Dir. Adrian Lyne, MGM, 1986 Style over sex, minus substance. That's a glib summation/dismissal of Adrian Lyne's 1986 blockbuster erotic drama, but it's not unfair or inaccurate. I took copious notes on this movie, most relating to some way Lyne and screenwriter Zalman King failed to make the film daring, dark, perverse, bold, or even a little erotic.  I noted, many times, that as an artifact of Hollywood's attempt to make sex-movies for an adult audience after home video made hardcore porn available to everyone, 9&1/2 WEEKS fascinates and depresses in equal measure. It's aesthetically fascinating, sociologically depressing. Lyne delivers a hyperstylized, superficial imagining of the US audience's "freaky" side and it's all pretty standard, you're-not-kinky-if-you-use-the-word-kinky kind of stuff.  Allegedly dom/sub-themed, both the film and the fantasies it trades in define predictable. A little gaslighting...

Grasshoppers & Nazis: Bob Fosse's Cabaret

 Liza Minelli, Michael York, Joel Grey, Fritz Weppert. Dir. Bob Fosse, Warner Bros., 1972 Once upon a time in the '80s, I wrote a paper for a college English class deconstructing the fable of the ant and the grasshopper, coming down on the side of the grasshopper with both feet. The grasshopper, I argued, is humankind's wanderlust, its irrepressible need to go new places and meet people and have adventures with them (or at least drinks), to be in and of moments, to laugh and feel good and not worry, and that, I argued, is the best of us. We need the grasshoppers to remind us life is beautiful when it is lived.  Back then, I hung around with grasshoppers, though I'm not sure I was one. The real grasshoppers I knew took to the air and seldom, if ever, returned. Their adventures took them everywhere but back to Short Vine Street, Cincinnati, anytime between 1987 & 1993. I loved to hear their wild tales when they did alight there again for a few days, but I had to make su...

No Return:Stanley Kramer's IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD

 IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD. Spencer Tracy, Ethel Merman, Milton Berle, Mickey Rooney, Sid Caesar. Dir. Stanley Kramer, MGM, 1963 I do not generally write about films I stop watching halfway. What's the point? I either have nothing positive to say about it or was in the wrong mood. In both cases I'm ignorant of its full length to perhaps do it justice. In the case of Stanley Kramer's 1963 comedy smash, however, I feel compelled to make an exception.  My problem with the movie is not my mood, nor disappointment because it's not the movie I once heard. In fact, my biggest problem is that I haven't heard it described in glowing terms, or any, since I was about 9. See, IAMMMMW used to air anually on one or another of the networks, often in December. My parents didn't care for it and never watched it, but my friends watched anytime it aired and talked about it in rapturous terms. Until about 9-10 years old, when it seemed to drop out of conversation, or conv...