Skip to main content

Kim Carnes was right: Irving Frapper's Now, Voyager

 Bette Davis, Paul Henreid, Claude Rains. Dir. Irving Rapper, Warner Bros., 1942


I knew one thing about Now, Voyager before today, the infamous scene in which Paul Henreid lights two cigarettes at one before passing one to Bette Davis, a moment paid homage and parodied hundreds of times since 1942. I did not know the scene plays out three times, and that in two of them Davis and Henreid share a look so carnal it's as if their eyes make love. That's why the scene's so famous. Lighting both cigarettes is smooth, turning the first puff into a sex scene the Hays Code censors couldn't touch is moviemaking genius.

I also didn't know that Now, Voyager is sort of a road movie, progressing along the route Davis's Charlotte Vale's, unmarried spinster of an ancient Boston family, life following her treatment for a nervous breakdown brought on by her cruel, domineering mother, passing through the stages of her transition to full, functional adulthood. These include a love affair with Paul Henried's Jerry, a married businessman whose shrewish wife forces him to give up on architecture, his passion, and envies his closeness with his daughter, Tina, the inevitable confrontation with her mother, in which she refuses to return to the harried, beaten life she once lived, and discovering a passion for psychiatric nursing when she begins spending time with an awkward tween girl at the same sanatorium where she convalesced. The girl, of course, turns out to be Jerry's daughter, institutionalized to keep peace in the family home, which will ultimately reunite Charlotte and Jerry as not lovers but nurse/caregiver and concerned, married parent.

Therein lies the rub. Davis's physical and psychological transformation from a shapeless, hopeless victim to a stylish, confident woman via her stay in the hospital and a long international cruise afterward by turns elicited sympathy, respect, admiration, and joy from me. She faces down her mother, negotiates the currents of a middle-aged love affair with an eminently marriageable widower, and stumbles by accident into peer-to-peer counseling with Tina. Coming from a one-time involvement with the 12 Step groups, I found the scenes in which Charlotte and Tina bond over shared experience touched me. Janis Wilson plays Tina as a lost girl getting found, a convincing performance on both sides of the emotional divide. And yet.

For all of Charlotte's progress and growth, for all her strength and maturity, in the end she chooses a life without romance in favor of the greater joys of helping raise Tina, a choice which looks like the choice made for her at the film's start by her mother, when she ends an adolescent shipboard fling by forcing Charlotte to be her nurse and caretaker. Though the screenplay and Charlotte try to emphasize her sacrifice is for a greater good, with Charlotte telling Jerry, "Don't let's ask for the moon. We have the stars," it felt to me as if she trades her fulfilled life first for an old woman, then for a young child, suggesting - what, that even a sleek and sophisticated woman's highest calling lies in mothering, not wifing?

That's a rather grim and hopeless conclusion to a hopeful and inspiring trudge along what the 12 Steppers call "the road of the spirit." It made me question the point of all her hard work, and that's a weird ending for a girl-positive movie like Now, Voyager.

A pretty-good mashup of comeback story, romance, and domestic drama, Now, Voyager works thanks to Davis's powerhouse performance, matched by her supposedly-favorite costar Claude Rains as a gruff, kindly psychiatrist, and a smattering of great character roles, like Gladys Cooper's implacable mother or Mary Wickes, one of the head nuns in the Sister Act movies, as a wisecracking nurse.

Hollywood frequently fails to keep melodrama out of romances, and with an added mental illness subplot the opportunities for melodrama expand geometrically. Now, Voyager largely, if not entirely, keeps the amped emotion under control, but Davis oversells it a few times. It's not hard, though, to understand Davis's star power. Not conventionally attractive by some standards, Davis used her eyes, her voice, and her manner to be sexy regardless of her "beauty." When I think of actors with great presence, Davis is one. She owns the film, even in her rare moments off camera. I can't imagine Now, Voyager with another female lead. I cannot imagine Now, Voyager being good without Davis. Or even particularly memorable. Thanks to a couple of cigarettes and two of the best-known eyes in the world, however, it's a film I'm writing about 79 years after its release.

Kim Carnes wasn't kidding. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

No Return:Stanley Kramer's IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD

 IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD. Spencer Tracy, Ethel Merman, Milton Berle, Mickey Rooney, Sid Caesar. Dir. Stanley Kramer, MGM, 1963 I do not generally write about films I stop watching halfway. What's the point? I either have nothing positive to say about it or was in the wrong mood. In both cases I'm ignorant of its full length to perhaps do it justice. In the case of Stanley Kramer's 1963 comedy smash, however, I feel compelled to make an exception.  My problem with the movie is not my mood, nor disappointment because it's not the movie I once heard. In fact, my biggest problem is that I haven't heard it described in glowing terms, or any, since I was about 9. See, IAMMMMW used to air anually on one or another of the networks, often in December. My parents didn't care for it and never watched it, but my friends watched anytime it aired and talked about it in rapturous terms. Until about 9-10 years old, when it seemed to drop out of conversation, or conv...

Junkie-fatigue: Taylor Hackford's Ray

 Jamie Foxx, Kerry Washington, Terence Howard, Warwick Davis, Curtis Armstrong. Dir. Taylor Hackford, Bristol Bay/Universal, 2004 Jamie Foxx, nominated for both Supporting Actor and Best Actor at the 2004 Academy Awards, won Best Actor for Ray and, watching Ray tonight for the first time in about 15 years, I'm glad it went down that way. Tom Cruise gave a career-best performance in Collateral, for which Foxx received his Supporting Actor nod. It's a great performance, too, but no moreso than Cruise, ignored by the Academy, so it feels right to me that Foxx got his statuette for the movie where he didn't share the spotlight with a star of Cruise's magnitude. Not that it would make much difference if Foxx had some high-voltage costar in Ray, because the movie simply doesn't exist without Foxx and his essay of Ray Charles. Not unlike Coal Miner's Daughter, the other music biopic whose star picked up a Best Actor, Ray occurs from Ray's point of view, so ther...

Obligatory TL;DR Statement of Purpose

 A not-so-brief explanatory note as to how this blog works: I can't recall a time when movies weren't my passion, my compulsion, my addiction. Ever since my parents took me to see Disney's Bedknobs&Broomsticks, I've been hopeless. Born in 1967, I grew up with free range parents. They took my brother and me to all kinds of movies, often using Hollywood as a babysitter. We saw movies about which many parents today would cluck their tongues (though nothing R-rated until I was 12. My first R-rated movie was MONTY PYTHON'S LIFE OF BRIAN.) Though my parents were professionals and we grew up affluent, our home saw its share of dysfunction. Dad was in the house, but not often present. Mom, stressed and disappointed at discovering her marriage wasn't an equal partnership, took out her frustrations on me.  Without getting too far into the weeds, let me just say my adult life has been far from typical middle class stability. I've never had a career. Never finished ...