Skip to main content

Good enough: The Ghost & the Darkness

 Michael Douglas, Val Kilmer, Emily Mortimer, Tom Wilkinson. Dir. Stephen Hopkins, Paramount, 1996


It's a Saturday night. No money, not enough to go out and do something. Friends all have plans. Or maybe it's Sunday afternoon, overcast, chilly, what Douglas Adams called "the long dark teatime of the soul." Or it's 1 a.m. and work ended at midnight but sleep won't be happening soon. What now?

Now it's time to flip on the tube, settle back on the sofa, and find something to pass the time. A movie. A masterpiece would be nice, of course, but Saturday nights and anytime after midnight and Sundays when football's on just aren't the times Superstation or your local indie channel program masterpieces. They run Casablanca or The Godfather when they can draw a big audience. On that Saturday in June when 34 broke, lonely people are channel surfing until sleep rescues them, Superstation runs a good-enough movie.

A timekiller. Something to hold the attention, to provide enough entertainment to give those 34 people their fix, their diversion until bedtime, something to keep them from thinking about that old revolver in the shoe closet for one more day. A movie like The Ghost and the Darkness.

These sort of circumstances explain why I already knew about The Ghost and the Darkness. I don't remember if it was a Saturday night or Sunday afternoon, whether HBO or Superstation or the Saturday Night Movie on CBS. Nor does it matter. I was bored, restless, sad maybe, and here's two hours about a couple guys trying to kill two lions in 19th Century Africa in order to build a bridge for a pan-Africa railroad. Filmed on location, lots of gorgeous scenery and elephants and hippos and shit, with a good cast and lots of nice helicopter and Steadicam shots to give it a touch of the epic adventure.

On that night, The Ghost and The Darkness rose to its moment. If it waals really only good-enough, that counted as so much better than the alternatives that by the time I turned off the TV I felt better, more relaxed. I stopped thinking about the shoe closet, and the movie took on near-mythic proportion in my memory. So much so that when I ran across the dvd at Goodwill Monday it went into the cart without hesitation.

Now, tonight, I have a stack of other dvds, many of them features I haven't ever seen. Tonight I have friends who will take my call. Tonight I have a massive essay on James Bond movies to compose. Tonight, I'm not one of 34 broke, lonely people. Tonight I have options.

Which means, even though The Ghost and The Darkness remains a good-enough movie, tonight was the wrong night for it. Tonight it was just-ok. Some other night or afternoon or overnight it may do the job for me again.

If you've never seen The Ghost and The Darkness before, and you like Douglas and Kilmer well enough, and you could stand to look at some gorgeous far-off land, and you don't mind men firing guns at marauding beasts, and you're staring down the barrel of one of those shoe-closet nights, I think you may find it good-enough to get over the hump until the pillow calls your name.

Just make sure it's one of those times. 

Comments

  1. I enjoyed this movie. I watched solely because of the soundtrack which I found at a used music store probably 20 years ago. Played the CD to death having never seen the movie. It was only two years ago that I finally watched it. One of my weirder movie moments.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cuck Fiction: Charles Vidor's GILDA

 Rita Hayworth, Glenn Ford, George MacReady, Steven Geray. Dir. Charles Vidor, Columbia, 1946 My favorite erotic fiction deals with cuckolding. The stories fascinate me. As people, cuckolds don't seem to think they're worth nice things. Or happiness. On the other hand, the cuckolding partners and their multiple lovers don't come over as the clear victors, either. Part of the fascination - maybe most of it - lies in trying to decide which party comes out the MOST degraded.  Is it the submissive, sensitive husband and his unsatisfactory size/staying power? Is it the "slutwife" who finds satiety in being transformed into a fuckdoll to humilate her husband? Or is it the lover - often black - who gets to degrade the sexy white lady but who doesn't otherwise matter? As in bdsm scenes, if the cuck is most degraded, that means he also "wins," as his desires to see his wife turned into a promiscuous slut while he gets to be bi without shame are most fulfi...

Obligatory TL;DR Statement of Purpose

 A not-so-brief explanatory note as to how this blog works: I can't recall a time when movies weren't my passion, my compulsion, my addiction. Ever since my parents took me to see Disney's Bedknobs&Broomsticks, I've been hopeless. Born in 1967, I grew up with free range parents. They took my brother and me to all kinds of movies, often using Hollywood as a babysitter. We saw movies about which many parents today would cluck their tongues (though nothing R-rated until I was 12. My first R-rated movie was MONTY PYTHON'S LIFE OF BRIAN.) Though my parents were professionals and we grew up affluent, our home saw its share of dysfunction. Dad was in the house, but not often present. Mom, stressed and disappointed at discovering her marriage wasn't an equal partnership, took out her frustrations on me.  Without getting too far into the weeds, let me just say my adult life has been far from typical middle class stability. I've never had a career. Never finished ...

Personal Movies: Robert Redford's ORDINARY PEOPLE

 Donald Sutherland, Mary Tyler Moore Timothy Hutton, Judd Hitsch. Dir. Robert Redford, Paramount, 1980 I have been fortunate - I suppose that's the word - to see my story on the big screen. Twice. We talk of identifying with movies, with characters, of moviegoing being our identity, but I never went to the movies expecting to see my life reflected back to me. The second time it occurred, with Jonathan Demme's RACHEL GETTING MARRIED, it at least had the benefit of being about a woman, so I can't get all theatrical about how I totes get Rachel. I don't, but I went home from treatment for family events and man, it looked a lot like that movie. The first time it happened, with Robert Redford's directorial debut, ORDINARY PEOPLE, it was a guy, and that guy, if older than my 13 years, lived a life that looked a whole lot like mine, minus the dead brother. In my case, my brother, my parents' biological son, is extravagantly the favorite, and my Mom & I know the...