Skip to main content

Good enough: The Ghost & the Darkness

 Michael Douglas, Val Kilmer, Emily Mortimer, Tom Wilkinson. Dir. Stephen Hopkins, Paramount, 1996


It's a Saturday night. No money, not enough to go out and do something. Friends all have plans. Or maybe it's Sunday afternoon, overcast, chilly, what Douglas Adams called "the long dark teatime of the soul." Or it's 1 a.m. and work ended at midnight but sleep won't be happening soon. What now?

Now it's time to flip on the tube, settle back on the sofa, and find something to pass the time. A movie. A masterpiece would be nice, of course, but Saturday nights and anytime after midnight and Sundays when football's on just aren't the times Superstation or your local indie channel program masterpieces. They run Casablanca or The Godfather when they can draw a big audience. On that Saturday in June when 34 broke, lonely people are channel surfing until sleep rescues them, Superstation runs a good-enough movie.

A timekiller. Something to hold the attention, to provide enough entertainment to give those 34 people their fix, their diversion until bedtime, something to keep them from thinking about that old revolver in the shoe closet for one more day. A movie like The Ghost and the Darkness.

These sort of circumstances explain why I already knew about The Ghost and the Darkness. I don't remember if it was a Saturday night or Sunday afternoon, whether HBO or Superstation or the Saturday Night Movie on CBS. Nor does it matter. I was bored, restless, sad maybe, and here's two hours about a couple guys trying to kill two lions in 19th Century Africa in order to build a bridge for a pan-Africa railroad. Filmed on location, lots of gorgeous scenery and elephants and hippos and shit, with a good cast and lots of nice helicopter and Steadicam shots to give it a touch of the epic adventure.

On that night, The Ghost and The Darkness rose to its moment. If it waals really only good-enough, that counted as so much better than the alternatives that by the time I turned off the TV I felt better, more relaxed. I stopped thinking about the shoe closet, and the movie took on near-mythic proportion in my memory. So much so that when I ran across the dvd at Goodwill Monday it went into the cart without hesitation.

Now, tonight, I have a stack of other dvds, many of them features I haven't ever seen. Tonight I have friends who will take my call. Tonight I have a massive essay on James Bond movies to compose. Tonight, I'm not one of 34 broke, lonely people. Tonight I have options.

Which means, even though The Ghost and The Darkness remains a good-enough movie, tonight was the wrong night for it. Tonight it was just-ok. Some other night or afternoon or overnight it may do the job for me again.

If you've never seen The Ghost and The Darkness before, and you like Douglas and Kilmer well enough, and you could stand to look at some gorgeous far-off land, and you don't mind men firing guns at marauding beasts, and you're staring down the barrel of one of those shoe-closet nights, I think you may find it good-enough to get over the hump until the pillow calls your name.

Just make sure it's one of those times. 

Comments

  1. The Red Queen (Sascha Ball)February 13, 2021 at 11:02 AM

    I enjoyed this movie. I watched solely because of the soundtrack which I found at a used music store probably 20 years ago. Played the CD to death having never seen the movie. It was only two years ago that I finally watched it. One of my weirder movie moments.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Friday Flop: Adrian Lyne's 9&1/2 WEEKS

 Kim Basinger, Mickey Rourke. Dir. Adrian Lyne, MGM, 1986 Style over sex, minus substance. That's a glib summation/dismissal of Adrian Lyne's 1986 blockbuster erotic drama, but it's not unfair or inaccurate. I took copious notes on this movie, most relating to some way Lyne and screenwriter Zalman King failed to make the film daring, dark, perverse, bold, or even a little erotic.  I noted, many times, that as an artifact of Hollywood's attempt to make sex-movies for an adult audience after home video made hardcore porn available to everyone, 9&1/2 WEEKS fascinates and depresses in equal measure. It's aesthetically fascinating, sociologically depressing. Lyne delivers a hyperstylized, superficial imagining of the US audience's "freaky" side and it's all pretty standard, you're-not-kinky-if-you-use-the-word-kinky kind of stuff.  Allegedly dom/sub-themed, both the film and the fantasies it trades in define predictable. A little gaslighting...
Post a Comment
Read more

Grasshoppers & Nazis: Bob Fosse's Cabaret

 Liza Minelli, Michael York, Joel Grey, Fritz Weppert. Dir. Bob Fosse, Warner Bros., 1972 Once upon a time in the '80s, I wrote a paper for a college English class deconstructing the fable of the ant and the grasshopper, coming down on the side of the grasshopper with both feet. The grasshopper, I argued, is humankind's wanderlust, its irrepressible need to go new places and meet people and have adventures with them (or at least drinks), to be in and of moments, to laugh and feel good and not worry, and that, I argued, is the best of us. We need the grasshoppers to remind us life is beautiful when it is lived.  Back then, I hung around with grasshoppers, though I'm not sure I was one. The real grasshoppers I knew took to the air and seldom, if ever, returned. Their adventures took them everywhere but back to Short Vine Street, Cincinnati, anytime between 1987 & 1993. I loved to hear their wild tales when they did alight there again for a few days, but I had to make su...
Post a Comment
Read more

No Return:Stanley Kramer's IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD

 IT'S A MAD, MAD, MAD, MAD WORLD. Spencer Tracy, Ethel Merman, Milton Berle, Mickey Rooney, Sid Caesar. Dir. Stanley Kramer, MGM, 1963 I do not generally write about films I stop watching halfway. What's the point? I either have nothing positive to say about it or was in the wrong mood. In both cases I'm ignorant of its full length to perhaps do it justice. In the case of Stanley Kramer's 1963 comedy smash, however, I feel compelled to make an exception.  My problem with the movie is not my mood, nor disappointment because it's not the movie I once heard. In fact, my biggest problem is that I haven't heard it described in glowing terms, or any, since I was about 9. See, IAMMMMW used to air anually on one or another of the networks, often in December. My parents didn't care for it and never watched it, but my friends watched anytime it aired and talked about it in rapturous terms. Until about 9-10 years old, when it seemed to drop out of conversation, or conv...
Post a Comment
Read more